<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204173</link>
    <description>Regular bail was granted in a complaint alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Customs Act after the High Court weighed the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner&#039;s personal circumstances and the stage of the trial. Although the allegations had economic implications and the petitioner&#039;s antecedents did not inspire confidence, she had remained in custody for more than a year, was a woman, her minor children were without her, charges had not been framed, and early conclusion of the trial was not reasonably foreseeable. On that basis, continued incarceration was considered unjustified, and bail was allowed subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204173</link>
      <description>Regular bail was granted in a complaint alleging offences under the Indian Penal Code and the Customs Act after the High Court weighed the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner&#039;s personal circumstances and the stage of the trial. Although the allegations had economic implications and the petitioner&#039;s antecedents did not inspire confidence, she had remained in custody for more than a year, was a woman, her minor children were without her, charges had not been framed, and early conclusion of the trial was not reasonably foreseeable. On that basis, continued incarceration was considered unjustified, and bail was allowed subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>