<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 142 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204167</link>
    <description>The Tribunal referred the case to a Division Bench to address key legal questions on determining the place of removal based on contractual terms and the eligibility of GTA services from the factory to the port of loading as input services for credit. The decision reflects the complexity and significance of the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 142 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204167</link>
      <description>The Tribunal referred the case to a Division Bench to address key legal questions on determining the place of removal based on contractual terms and the eligibility of GTA services from the factory to the port of loading as input services for credit. The decision reflects the complexity and significance of the issues raised in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>