<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 429 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204166</link>
    <description>The court held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act to revise the order made by the IAC before the insertion of the Explanation in 1984. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, disposing of the reference in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 429 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204166</link>
      <description>The court held that the Commissioner lacked jurisdiction under section 263 of the Income-tax Act to revise the order made by the IAC before the insertion of the Explanation in 1984. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, disposing of the reference in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>