https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204153 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA licence but upheld the forfeiture of the security deposit due to violations of Regulations 13(a) and 13(k) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations. The appellant was permitted to resume business as a CHA upon submission of a new security deposit. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Aug 2011 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204153 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the CHA licence but upheld the forfeiture of the security deposit due to violations of Regulations 13(a) and 13(k) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations. The appellant was permitted to resume business as a CHA upon submission of a new security deposit. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204153