<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204152</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to release the goods subject to specific conditions, including immediate payment of duty, provision of a bank guarantee, furnishing a personal bond, and completion of the adjudication process within four weeks. The Central Government Standing Counsel did not object to following the previous court order, leading to the closure of the connected motion without costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 495 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204152</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents to release the goods subject to specific conditions, including immediate payment of duty, provision of a bank guarantee, furnishing a personal bond, and completion of the adjudication process within four weeks. The Central Government Standing Counsel did not object to following the previous court order, leading to the closure of the connected motion without costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>