<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 356 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204142</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the stay application and recognizing their entitlement to the credit of service tax paid for services availed in December 2004, despite the Revenue&#039;s contention on the tax liability. The decision emphasized the significance of considering the circumstances and intentions of the parties involved in tax disputes, particularly concerning penalties and limitation periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 356 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204142</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the stay application and recognizing their entitlement to the credit of service tax paid for services availed in December 2004, despite the Revenue&#039;s contention on the tax liability. The decision emphasized the significance of considering the circumstances and intentions of the parties involved in tax disputes, particularly concerning penalties and limitation periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>