<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 941 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204137</link>
    <description>A subordinate criminal court cannot use inherent powers reserved to the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to involve itself in investigation or require interrogation in its presence. The statutory scheme keeps investigation within the executive domain, and judicial intervention that makes the court a participant in the investigative process risks undermining neutrality and blurring the separation between adjudication and investigation. Consistently with the principle that investigation should proceed unhindered except in exceptional cases, the bail order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on merits before the competent court without influence from the earlier order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 941 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204137</link>
      <description>A subordinate criminal court cannot use inherent powers reserved to the High Court under Section 482 CrPC to involve itself in investigation or require interrogation in its presence. The statutory scheme keeps investigation within the executive domain, and judicial intervention that makes the court a participant in the investigative process risks undermining neutrality and blurring the separation between adjudication and investigation. Consistently with the principle that investigation should proceed unhindered except in exceptional cases, the bail order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration on merits before the competent court without influence from the earlier order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>