<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 52 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204134</link>
    <description>Reversal of inadmissible credit before the show cause notice can neutralise prior availment for an exemption condition requiring that no credit be taken, so prima facie protection may remain available. The Tribunal also noted that a retrospective notification and its enabling provision had not been considered by the adjudicating authority; because that legal development could materially affect liability and refund consequences, the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. The demand and penalty order therefore did not stand in its present form, and the exemption claim had to be re-examined in light of the reversal of credit and retrospective relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 52 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204134</link>
      <description>Reversal of inadmissible credit before the show cause notice can neutralise prior availment for an exemption condition requiring that no credit be taken, so prima facie protection may remain available. The Tribunal also noted that a retrospective notification and its enabling provision had not been considered by the adjudicating authority; because that legal development could materially affect liability and refund consequences, the order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration. The demand and penalty order therefore did not stand in its present form, and the exemption claim had to be re-examined in light of the reversal of credit and retrospective relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>