<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 502 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204114</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the refund claim was not time-barred, the duty payment pending appeal was valid, and there was no challenge to the ruling on unjust enrichment in favor of the appellants. The decision provided relief to the appellants and directed the authorities to process the refund claim accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 502 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204114</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the refund claim was not time-barred, the duty payment pending appeal was valid, and there was no challenge to the ruling on unjust enrichment in favor of the appellants. The decision provided relief to the appellants and directed the authorities to process the refund claim accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>