<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 348 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204106</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by UTL, setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner. The proceedings were found to be in violation of principles of res judicata, lacked specificity, and were time-barred for most of the period in dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 09:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 348 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204106</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by UTL, setting aside the demand, interest, and penalties imposed by the Commissioner. The proceedings were found to be in violation of principles of res judicata, lacked specificity, and were time-barred for most of the period in dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204106</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>