<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 347 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204102</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee-trust was not entitled to exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act as it did not exist solely for educational purposes. Additionally, the trust violated sections 11 and 13 by making impermissible investments. Both issues were decided in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee-trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 347 - Andhra Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204102</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee-trust was not entitled to exemption under section 10(22) of the Income-tax Act as it did not exist solely for educational purposes. Additionally, the trust violated sections 11 and 13 by making impermissible investments. Both issues were decided in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee-trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>