<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 346 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204100</link>
    <description>Consideration for software supplied under a restrictive end-user licence was analysed under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Because the licensee obtained only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the program internally, with no right to copy, modify, sublicense, reverse engineer, or commercially exploit it, the payment was treated as consideration for a copyrighted article and not for any transfer of copyright rights. On that basis, it was not royalty; the foreign recipients&#039; income was characterised as business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment, and no tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2012 11:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 346 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204100</link>
      <description>Consideration for software supplied under a restrictive end-user licence was analysed under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article 12(3) of the India-USA DTAA. Because the licensee obtained only a non-exclusive, non-transferable right to use the program internally, with no right to copy, modify, sublicense, reverse engineer, or commercially exploit it, the payment was treated as consideration for a copyrighted article and not for any transfer of copyright rights. On that basis, it was not royalty; the foreign recipients&#039; income was characterised as business income not taxable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment, and no tax was required to be deducted at source under section 195.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>