<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 628 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204099</link>
    <description>The court found that the assessment order, though potentially flawed, did not significantly harm Revenue&#039;s interests. It was determined that post-amendment, writing off a debt is adequate for deduction claims without proving its bad status. The case was referred to the regular Bench for action based on the majority opinion, emphasizing that internal notes and private discussions among Members were irrelevant to the core dispute over bad debt allowability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 628 - ITAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204099</link>
      <description>The court found that the assessment order, though potentially flawed, did not significantly harm Revenue&#039;s interests. It was determined that post-amendment, writing off a debt is adequate for deduction claims without proving its bad status. The case was referred to the regular Bench for action based on the majority opinion, emphasizing that internal notes and private discussions among Members were irrelevant to the core dispute over bad debt allowability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>