<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 498 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204091</link>
    <description>The court confirmed the confiscation of goods under Section 113(1)(i) of the Customs Act, upheld redemption fines, and confirmed penalties on partnership firms. Composite penalties under different statutes were set aside. Penalties on Shri Bilal Latif Memon and government officers were also set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement in offenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 498 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204091</link>
      <description>The court confirmed the confiscation of goods under Section 113(1)(i) of the Customs Act, upheld redemption fines, and confirmed penalties on partnership firms. Composite penalties under different statutes were set aside. Penalties on Shri Bilal Latif Memon and government officers were also set aside due to lack of evidence of their involvement in offenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>