<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204084</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal found merit in the department&#039;s arguments regarding the alleged suppression of brand names in goods sold by the appellants. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the lower appellate authority for a reevaluation of evidence, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing to both parties. A cross-objection filed by the respondent was dismissed as it was seen as a response to the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 272 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204084</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal found merit in the department&#039;s arguments regarding the alleged suppression of brand names in goods sold by the appellants. The tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the lower appellate authority for a reevaluation of evidence, emphasizing the need for a fair hearing to both parties. A cross-objection filed by the respondent was dismissed as it was seen as a response to the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>