<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204082</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest but set aside the penalties on the appellants. The appellants were directed to recover the excess credit amount from the supplier. The judgment partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties on the appellants while upholding the duty and interest demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177626" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 31 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204082</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for duty and interest but set aside the penalties on the appellants. The appellants were directed to recover the excess credit amount from the supplier. The judgment partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalties on the appellants while upholding the duty and interest demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>