<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204079</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty and rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal on the maintenance of separate accounts for Cenvat credit utilization. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent tax treatment by the revenue and the requirement for clear evidence to support demands raised beyond the limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 187 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204079</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalty and rejecting the revenue&#039;s appeal on the maintenance of separate accounts for Cenvat credit utilization. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent tax treatment by the revenue and the requirement for clear evidence to support demands raised beyond the limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>