<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 332 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204065</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the refund claim for excess duty paid due to incorrect invoices. The case centered on the application of Section 154 of the Customs Act 1962 to rectify clerical errors in duty payments. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of dispute over the assessment order and affirmed that the error stemmed from incorrect invoicing, warranting a refund. The decision highlighted the supplier&#039;s corrective actions and supported the importer&#039;s claim, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 332 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204065</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, allowing the refund claim for excess duty paid due to incorrect invoices. The case centered on the application of Section 154 of the Customs Act 1962 to rectify clerical errors in duty payments. The Tribunal emphasized the absence of dispute over the assessment order and affirmed that the error stemmed from incorrect invoicing, warranting a refund. The decision highlighted the supplier&#039;s corrective actions and supported the importer&#039;s claim, ultimately rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>