<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 238 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that Customs Authorities and DGFT must act independently and cannot conduct parallel proceedings with conflicting findings. It upheld the 100% export-oriented unit&#039;s position, ruling out violation of exemption conditions for customs duty on imported capital goods. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory requirements and the significance of findings on merits in legal proceedings, ultimately dismissing the appeals as the revenue did not challenge the favorable findings on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 238 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that Customs Authorities and DGFT must act independently and cannot conduct parallel proceedings with conflicting findings. It upheld the 100% export-oriented unit&#039;s position, ruling out violation of exemption conditions for customs duty on imported capital goods. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to statutory requirements and the significance of findings on merits in legal proceedings, ultimately dismissing the appeals as the revenue did not challenge the favorable findings on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>