<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204060</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in job work was admissible where the job-work activity fell within the relevant exemption notification and the final product chain remained dutiable in the prescribed manner. The Tribunal held that credit could not be denied merely because the goods processed under job work were cleared without payment of duty, and a demand under Rule 6(3) could not be sustained on that basis. The discussion also reinforced judicial discipline, noting that the appellate authority was bound to follow earlier precedent supporting admissibility of credit in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 494 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204060</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on inputs used in job work was admissible where the job-work activity fell within the relevant exemption notification and the final product chain remained dutiable in the prescribed manner. The Tribunal held that credit could not be denied merely because the goods processed under job work were cleared without payment of duty, and a demand under Rule 6(3) could not be sustained on that basis. The discussion also reinforced judicial discipline, noting that the appellate authority was bound to follow earlier precedent supporting admissibility of credit in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>