<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 237 - MADRAS  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204057</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show cause notice for service tax on educational cess outside India due to the petitioner not exhausting alternative remedies. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice within four weeks, with the respondent required to decide within eight weeks thereafter. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing available remedies before resorting to writ petitions, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 237 - MADRAS  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204057</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a show cause notice for service tax on educational cess outside India due to the petitioner not exhausting alternative remedies. The petitioner was directed to respond to the notice within four weeks, with the respondent required to decide within eight weeks thereafter. The court emphasized the importance of utilizing available remedies before resorting to writ petitions, without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>