<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 538 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204054</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal of a partnership firm acting as a broker in the Bombay Stock Exchange for deduction of bad debts written off, emphasizing that post-April 1, 1989, it is sufficient if debts are written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The ITAT clarified that it is not necessary to establish irrecoverability. Regarding the allowability of business loss, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify specific aspects related to the quantification of bad debts written off, remanding the issue for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177599" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 538 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204054</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal of a partnership firm acting as a broker in the Bombay Stock Exchange for deduction of bad debts written off, emphasizing that post-April 1, 1989, it is sufficient if debts are written off as irrecoverable in the accounts. The ITAT clarified that it is not necessary to establish irrecoverability. Regarding the allowability of business loss, the ITAT directed the Assessing Officer to verify specific aspects related to the quantification of bad debts written off, remanding the issue for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>