<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 334 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204042</link>
    <description>Processing and treatment of liquid chemical effluents for consideration was examined for possible classification as Business Auxiliary Service. Earlier decisions had held similar waste treatment or incineration activities outside that service head, and a Board circular stated that incineration or shredding of bio-medical waste does not amount to processing of goods or service provision on behalf of clients. Because the adjudicating authority had not considered the circular or the relevant precedents, the matter was remanded for fresh decision after proper reconsideration and a reasonable opportunity to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 334 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204042</link>
      <description>Processing and treatment of liquid chemical effluents for consideration was examined for possible classification as Business Auxiliary Service. Earlier decisions had held similar waste treatment or incineration activities outside that service head, and a Board circular stated that incineration or shredding of bio-medical waste does not amount to processing of goods or service provision on behalf of clients. Because the adjudicating authority had not considered the circular or the relevant precedents, the matter was remanded for fresh decision after proper reconsideration and a reasonable opportunity to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>