<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 491 - Madhya Pradesh High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204038</link>
    <description>The court held that the designated authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, does not have the power to condone delays in tax payments as there is no provision for such discretion. Additionally, it was determined that the tax payment was not made within the prescribed time limit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition due to lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 17:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 491 - Madhya Pradesh High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204038</link>
      <description>The court held that the designated authority under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998, does not have the power to condone delays in tax payments as there is no provision for such discretion. Additionally, it was determined that the tax payment was not made within the prescribed time limit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition due to lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>