<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204020</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was upheld because it had made a clear factual finding that the assessee discharged its duty liability in accordance with the annual capacity of production order and, after final determination, there was no contravention of the applicable rules. With the factual basis of default negated, the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and the assessee&#039;s relief was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 227 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204020</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s deletion of penalty was upheld because it had made a clear factual finding that the assessee discharged its duty liability in accordance with the annual capacity of production order and, after final determination, there was no contravention of the applicable rules. With the factual basis of default negated, the Revenue&#039;s challenge did not give rise to any substantial question of law. The appeal was therefore not entertained on merits and the assessee&#039;s relief was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>