<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 326 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204009</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the services provided by the appellant were appropriately classified as &#039;Business Support Services&#039; rather than &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;. As &#039;Business Support Services&#039; only became taxable from 1-5-2006, the appellant was not liable for service tax for the period before this date. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 326 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204009</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the services provided by the appellant were appropriately classified as &#039;Business Support Services&#039; rather than &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039;. As &#039;Business Support Services&#039; only became taxable from 1-5-2006, the appellant was not liable for service tax for the period before this date. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the previous order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>