https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204001 The Tribunal noted apparent non-compliance with its earlier direction requiring the Deputy Commissioner to decide the adjudication afresh within four months, preferably by 31-12-2009, and observed that no hearing or disposal had begun and no extension had been sought. It therefore issued notice to the Deputy Commissioner, Jabalpur, to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated, returnable on 3-5-2010. Concurrently, it granted an interim stay of the departmental proceedings commenced pursuant to the letter dated 17-11-09, to continue meanwhile until further orders. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jul 2013 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204001 The Tribunal noted apparent non-compliance with its earlier direction requiring the Deputy Commissioner to decide the adjudication afresh within four months, preferably by 31-12-2009, and observed that no hearing or disposal had begun and no extension had been sought. It therefore issued notice to the Deputy Commissioner, Jabalpur, to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated, returnable on 3-5-2010. Concurrently, it granted an interim stay of the departmental proceedings commenced pursuant to the letter dated 17-11-09, to continue meanwhile until further orders. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=204001