<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 170 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203998</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai extended the stay period for the appellant and allowed the appeals, settling the issue that repacking lubricating oil into smaller packs does not amount to manufacture before a certain date. The demand was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 170 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203998</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai extended the stay period for the appellant and allowed the appeals, settling the issue that repacking lubricating oil into smaller packs does not amount to manufacture before a certain date. The demand was set aside, and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>