<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 167 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203988</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 194C(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the individual assessee for the relevant assessment year, leading to the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) being unjustified. The challenge against the addition on account of Gross Profit estimation was dismissed as not pressed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177534" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 167 - ITAT, Kolkata</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203988</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling that Section 194C(1) of the Income Tax Act did not apply to the individual assessee for the relevant assessment year, leading to the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) being unjustified. The challenge against the addition on account of Gross Profit estimation was dismissed as not pressed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203988</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>