<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 166 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203983</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the seizure of the vessel by Customs Authorities. The cancellation of the essentiality certificate without hearing the petitioners was deemed unjustified, and the vessel&#039;s use for the petroleum project was considered valid under the Customs Act. The court directed Customs Authorities to release the vessel, with restrictions on its use or re-export until adjudication completion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 166 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203983</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioners, quashing the seizure of the vessel by Customs Authorities. The cancellation of the essentiality certificate without hearing the petitioners was deemed unjustified, and the vessel&#039;s use for the petroleum project was considered valid under the Customs Act. The court directed Customs Authorities to release the vessel, with restrictions on its use or re-export until adjudication completion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>