<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals related to input service credit for local travel and medical insurance, finding them essential for the business. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on meal coupons and outdoor catering, remanding for quantification of recovered amounts for subsidised food. No penalty was imposed as the dispute primarily concerned statutory interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 379 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals related to input service credit for local travel and medical insurance, finding them essential for the business. The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on meal coupons and outdoor catering, remanding for quantification of recovered amounts for subsidised food. No penalty was imposed as the dispute primarily concerned statutory interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>