<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 132 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203969</link>
    <description>The HC held that security services provided by a manufacturer at residential quarters for its workers are not input services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture of the final product and therefore do not qualify for cenvat credit. The provision of residential accommodation and attendant security was deemed voluntary and unconnected with the manufacturing activity; benefit of cenvat credit was denied, consistent with the earlier view of the Bombay HC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 132 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203969</link>
      <description>The HC held that security services provided by a manufacturer at residential quarters for its workers are not input services used directly or indirectly in relation to manufacture of the final product and therefore do not qualify for cenvat credit. The provision of residential accommodation and attendant security was deemed voluntary and unconnected with the manufacturing activity; benefit of cenvat credit was denied, consistent with the earlier view of the Bombay HC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>