<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 313 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203959</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the liability of the service receiver to pay service tax, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a similar case. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to reconsider taxability, liability, and penalties in light of relevant legal precedents not previously considered. It clarified that a fresh examination was necessary based on the legal principles discussed, without delving into the merits of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 16:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 313 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203959</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and remanded the case for fresh adjudication. It emphasized the liability of the service receiver to pay service tax, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in a similar case. The Tribunal directed the Commissioner to reconsider taxability, liability, and penalties in light of relevant legal precedents not previously considered. It clarified that a fresh examination was necessary based on the legal principles discussed, without delving into the merits of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>