<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 221 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203958</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing manufacturers of excisable goods to avail credit on GTA services. The respondents, acting as both service providers and recipients, were deemed eligible for the credit under Cenvat Credit Rules. Precedents cited supported the decision, leading to the rejection of the department&#039;s appeals for service tax, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 221 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203958</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing manufacturers of excisable goods to avail credit on GTA services. The respondents, acting as both service providers and recipients, were deemed eligible for the credit under Cenvat Credit Rules. Precedents cited supported the decision, leading to the rejection of the department&#039;s appeals for service tax, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>