<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 216 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203943</link>
    <description>The tribunal acknowledged the impact of legal confusion on compliance, emphasized the need for reasons in penalty imposition, and granted partial relief by waiving penalties in both appeal cases due to the absence of deliberate defiance of the law and insufficient justification for the penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 22:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 216 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203943</link>
      <description>The tribunal acknowledged the impact of legal confusion on compliance, emphasized the need for reasons in penalty imposition, and granted partial relief by waiving penalties in both appeal cases due to the absence of deliberate defiance of the law and insufficient justification for the penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>