https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203927 The court upheld the suspension of the petitioner's license under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, finding the action justified under Regulation 20(2) due to ongoing investigations and the risk of further irregularities. Emphasizing the distinct purposes of Regulations 20(2) and 22, the court ruled that the decision was not arbitrary or mala fide. The petitioner was granted a hearing opportunity within 15 days as per Regulation 20(3), allowing for potential revocation of the suspension based on their presentation. The court dismissed the petition without interference, leaving the case open for further proceedings post-hearing. en-us Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jun 2011 12:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203927 The court upheld the suspension of the petitioner's license under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004, finding the action justified under Regulation 20(2) due to ongoing investigations and the risk of further irregularities. Emphasizing the distinct purposes of Regulations 20(2) and 22, the court ruled that the decision was not arbitrary or mala fide. The petitioner was granted a hearing opportunity within 15 days as per Regulation 20(3), allowing for potential revocation of the suspension based on their presentation. The court dismissed the petition without interference, leaving the case open for further proceedings post-hearing. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 16 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203927