https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203924 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the alleged undervaluation of impugned goods due to the relationship between the parties. However, the duty demand on branded goods was upheld, and the matter was remanded for quantification. The challenge to the cum-duty benefit was dismissed by the Tribunal. en-us Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 30 Apr 2011 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203924 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants regarding the alleged undervaluation of impugned goods due to the relationship between the parties. However, the duty demand on branded goods was upheld, and the matter was remanded for quantification. The challenge to the cum-duty benefit was dismissed by the Tribunal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 06 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203924