<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 622 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203917</link>
    <description>In a service tax dispute concerning purchase and sale activities claimed to fall under Business Auxiliary Service, the tribunal treated the taxability and classification issue as fit for determination at final hearing. As the entire service tax demand had already been deposited, it considered further pre-deposit of the balance amount unnecessary at that stage and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit. Recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 622 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203917</link>
      <description>In a service tax dispute concerning purchase and sale activities claimed to fall under Business Auxiliary Service, the tribunal treated the taxability and classification issue as fit for determination at final hearing. As the entire service tax demand had already been deposited, it considered further pre-deposit of the balance amount unnecessary at that stage and granted waiver of the balance pre-deposit. Recovery was stayed until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>