<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (6) TMI 618 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203914</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order regarding the cost of constructions claimed by the assessee for two properties, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The total cost claimed was Rs. 24.6 lakhs, but the Assessing Authority assessed income at Rs. 35,99,050, disallowing certain gifts and advance receipts. The Tribunal favored the valuation based on State PWD rates over the Departmental Valuer&#039;s valuation and upheld the disallowance of advance receipts. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found, with the Tribunal deeming the approved valuer&#039;s valuation reasonable and not arbitrary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 10:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (6) TMI 618 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203914</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) order regarding the cost of constructions claimed by the assessee for two properties, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The total cost claimed was Rs. 24.6 lakhs, but the Assessing Authority assessed income at Rs. 35,99,050, disallowing certain gifts and advance receipts. The Tribunal favored the valuation based on State PWD rates over the Departmental Valuer&#039;s valuation and upheld the disallowance of advance receipts. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial question of law was found, with the Tribunal deeming the approved valuer&#039;s valuation reasonable and not arbitrary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>