<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 170 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203874</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant only a partial waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for an appeal under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; request for complete waiver was denied due to findings that they availed cenvat credit on fake invoices. Despite citing financial hardships and previous waivers, the court found no strong prima facie case on merits to warrant complete waiver. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasizing that financial hardship alone is insufficient grounds for complete waiver without a strong case on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 170 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203874</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant only a partial waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for an appeal under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners&#039; request for complete waiver was denied due to findings that they availed cenvat credit on fake invoices. Despite citing financial hardships and previous waivers, the court found no strong prima facie case on merits to warrant complete waiver. The court dismissed the petition, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and emphasizing that financial hardship alone is insufficient grounds for complete waiver without a strong case on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>