<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 297 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203846</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity for assessment to precede penalty proceedings and deleting the penalty imposed under section 158BFA due to the premature imposition before finalizing the assessment. The ITAT held that penalty proceedings must follow finalization of assessment, as per the Nawn Estates case, highlighting the sequential nature of assessment and penalty proceedings. The Assessing Officer was directed to take appropriate action in compliance with the law following the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 15:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 297 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203846</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal, emphasizing the necessity for assessment to precede penalty proceedings and deleting the penalty imposed under section 158BFA due to the premature imposition before finalizing the assessment. The ITAT held that penalty proceedings must follow finalization of assessment, as per the Nawn Estates case, highlighting the sequential nature of assessment and penalty proceedings. The Assessing Officer was directed to take appropriate action in compliance with the law following the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203846</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>