<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 205 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203845</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), finding that the assessee made a false and bogus claim of expenditure, not in accordance with the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision emphasized that merely claiming an expense in the profit &amp;amp; loss account does not absolve the assessee from penalty if the claim is not bona fide and against settled legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 205 - ITAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203845</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the penalty under Section 271(1)(c), finding that the assessee made a false and bogus claim of expenditure, not in accordance with the Income Tax Act. The appeal was dismissed, confirming the penalty imposed for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The decision emphasized that merely claiming an expense in the profit &amp;amp; loss account does not absolve the assessee from penalty if the claim is not bona fide and against settled legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>