<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 474 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203835</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but set aside the penalties imposed under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, by invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the reasonable cause shown by the appellant. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 474 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203835</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for service tax and interest but set aside the penalties imposed under sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, by invoking section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, due to the reasonable cause shown by the appellant. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>