<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203809</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1999-00 and 2001-02. It found that the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the disallowances or additions did not warrant penalty imposition. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s claims were made in good faith, and there was no intentional suppression of facts, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 130 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203809</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, deleting penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment years 1999-00 and 2001-02. It found that the assessee had disclosed all material facts, and the disallowances or additions did not warrant penalty imposition. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee&#039;s claims were made in good faith, and there was no intentional suppression of facts, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>