<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 221 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203806</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the condonation of a 7-day delay in filing the appeal by M/s Kunal Travels (Cargo). The Tribunal waived the penalty of Rs. 75,000 imposed under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, on the applicants involved in the export of basmati rice. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intent by the applicants and granted relief by waiving the penalty and staying the recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 17:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177358" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 221 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203806</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the condonation of a 7-day delay in filing the appeal by M/s Kunal Travels (Cargo). The Tribunal waived the penalty of Rs. 75,000 imposed under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, on the applicants involved in the export of basmati rice. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found no evidence of mala fide intent by the applicants and granted relief by waiving the penalty and staying the recovery pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>