<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 297 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203805</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the findings of the adjudicating authority, confirming penalties and customs duty recovery from the involved parties. Customs officers&#039; and traders&#039; appeals were dismissed, while revenue&#039;s appeals against certain officers and individuals were allowed, imposing penalties for their involvement in smuggling activities. The tribunal stressed compliance with customs regulations and the serious repercussions of customs duty evasion and smuggling.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 297 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203805</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the findings of the adjudicating authority, confirming penalties and customs duty recovery from the involved parties. Customs officers&#039; and traders&#039; appeals were dismissed, while revenue&#039;s appeals against certain officers and individuals were allowed, imposing penalties for their involvement in smuggling activities. The tribunal stressed compliance with customs regulations and the serious repercussions of customs duty evasion and smuggling.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>