<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 295 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203800</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment focused on compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the inclusion of the cost of free packing material in the transaction value. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make a further deposit to pursue their appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence. The decision highlighted the significance of temporal considerations in legal matters and established a clear consequence for non-compliance with the deposit directive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 295 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203800</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal&#039;s judgment focused on compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and the inclusion of the cost of free packing material in the transaction value. The Tribunal directed the appellants to make a further deposit to pursue their appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would result in automatic dismissal of the appeal, emphasizing the importance of procedural adherence. The decision highlighted the significance of temporal considerations in legal matters and established a clear consequence for non-compliance with the deposit directive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203800</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>