<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 294 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203799</link>
    <description>Exemption on inputs used in the manufacture of non-alloy steel ingots and billets was unavailable where the relevant notification, as amended, expressly excluded final products classifiable under sub-headings 7206.90 and 7207.90. The goods in question fell within that excluded category, and the subsequent circular confirmed that the notification benefit did not extend to such cases. On that basis, the exemption claim failed and the demand was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 294 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203799</link>
      <description>Exemption on inputs used in the manufacture of non-alloy steel ingots and billets was unavailable where the relevant notification, as amended, expressly excluded final products classifiable under sub-headings 7206.90 and 7207.90. The goods in question fell within that excluded category, and the subsequent circular confirmed that the notification benefit did not extend to such cases. On that basis, the exemption claim failed and the demand was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>