<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 498 - Madras High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203786</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of amendments to original certificates under Section 90(1) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, finding them as permissible corrections rather than assessments reopening. However, it ruled in favor of petitioners challenging rejection of declarations due to delayed payments, directing issuance of necessary certificates under Section 90(2) of the Act within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 498 - Madras High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203786</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of amendments to original certificates under Section 90(1) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, finding them as permissible corrections rather than assessments reopening. However, it ruled in favor of petitioners challenging rejection of declarations due to delayed payments, directing issuance of necessary certificates under Section 90(2) of the Act within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>