<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 278 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203779</link>
    <description>Enhanced interest under Notification No. 12/2003-C.E. (N.T.) applied to duty paid after its commencement, because the notification was prospective and the liability to interest arose on the date the delayed duty was actually paid. The argument based on cases concerning penalties imposed before a provision came into force was inapplicable, as this matter concerned only an enhanced rate of interest within an existing charging framework. The demand for interest was therefore sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 278 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203779</link>
      <description>Enhanced interest under Notification No. 12/2003-C.E. (N.T.) applied to duty paid after its commencement, because the notification was prospective and the liability to interest arose on the date the delayed duty was actually paid. The argument based on cases concerning penalties imposed before a provision came into force was inapplicable, as this matter concerned only an enhanced rate of interest within an existing charging framework. The demand for interest was therefore sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>